Legal Opinion

Beck v. Felenzer

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1924No. 5,366PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

The real estate which is the subject of this controversy was conveyed by Emil Felenzer, then a widower, to Walter A. Beck by deed which was intended as a mortgage to secure the payment of a promissory note given Beck by Felenzer. Walter A. Beck transferred the note and executed a deed to the property to Charles F. Beck. After due time the latter brought an action in foreclosure against Emil Felenzer, Ella C. Felenzer, his wife, and others, obtained a decree in December, 1921, and bought in the property at sheriff’s sale in January, 1922. The sheriff gave the purchaser, Charles F. Beck, a deed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terrell v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Kirsch v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State v. LagoniMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Baker v. Butte Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. McDermott Mining Co. v. McDermottMontana Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. MussigbrodMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Johannes v. DwireMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Boucher v. St. GeorgeMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. United States National Bank v. ChavezOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF LOS ANGELES v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API