In re Lieberman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Sherman, J. (dissenting).
As stated in Eastern C. S. Co. v. B. & M. P. I. U., Local No. 45 (200 App. Div. 714, 717): “ The proper practice for reviewing an order in either a civil or a criminal contempt proceeding in a civil action is, therefore, by appeal from the order.” Here there was no appeal from the decree of the surrogate directing Springer, an executor, to pay to Lieberman the *310sum of $1,000 and costs, nor from the order of April 4, 1929, which adjudged him in contempt of court and fined him the sum of $1,096.50, theretofore directed by decree of May 18, 1928, to be paid to Lieberman;…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- People, Ex Rel. v. . Court of Oyer and TermNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Bolen v. . CrosbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Eastern Concrete Steel Co. v. Bricklayers' & Mason Plasterers' International Union, Local No. 45Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- In re PaleaisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.