Legal Opinion
Dunne v. City of Boston
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided October 10, 1996No. 95-P-486PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Following the entry of a Superior Court judgment ordering the city to pay Dunne, a city employee who sustained a work-related injury, the difference between his salary and the weekly benefits he was receiving under G. L. c. 152, as required by St. 1970, c. 800, the city did not appeal. Thereafter, disputes between the parties arose about whether c. 800 applied to partial as well as total disability payments and whether Dunne was entitled to interest on the judgment. On Dunne’s motions for clarification, the judge concluded that the city was to make payments so long as Dunne received workers’…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- O'Malley v. O'MalleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Weitzel v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Champlin v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Shumaker v. Lucerne-in-Maine Community Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- DaLuz v. Department of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- FHS Properties v. BC AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. City of Boston (In re SW Boston Hotel Venture, LLC)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2012
- Russo's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Douglas v. Kosinski (In Re Kosinski)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.