Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. McLeod v. McInnis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 31, 1982No. 21787Published

1DissentGregory, Justice

I respectfully dissent. In my view no justiciable controversy was presented, therefore, I would dismiss this action.

An action brought pursuant to the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, South Carolina Code Ann. §§ 15-53-10 through 15-53-140 (1976) must involve an actual, justiciable controversy. South Carolina Electric & Gas Company v. South Carolina Public Service Authority, 215 S. C. 193, 54 S. E. (2d) 777 (1949). “A justiciable controversy is a real and substantial controversy which is ripe and appropriate for judicial determination, as distinguished from this dispute of a contingent,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. Orr v. ClyburnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  3. Power v. McNairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  4. Williams Furniture Corp. v. Southern Coatings & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  5. Booth v. GrissomSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API