Legal Opinion

Colliers, Dow and Condon, Inc. v. Schwartz

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 12, 2005No. AC 25537PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DRANGINIS, J.

In Colliers, Dow & Condon, Inc. v. Schwartz, 77 Conn. App. 462, 823 A.2d 438 (2003) (Colliers I), this court reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the case for further proceedings. On remand, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Colliers, Dow & Condon, Inc., against the defendant K.F. Associates, LLP. The plaintiff appealed from the judgment, claiming that the court improperly concluded that it was not entitled to a judgment against the defendant Leonard J. Schwartz. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Dacey v. Connecticut Bar Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Nowell v. NowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Colliers, Dow & Condon, Inc. v. SchwartzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Wilburn v. Mount Sinai Medical CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. Rudder v. MAMANASCO LAKE PARK ASS'N, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Morris v. Cee Dee, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Young v. VlahosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  5. Seligson v. BrowerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API