Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Arrow Transportation Co. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1962No. 36320PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.
March 31, 1960, Arrow Transportation Company of Delaware and others, each of which is a common car*826rier engaged in hauling petroleum and other liquid products in bulk, filed with the Washington Public Service Commission (now the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission) a complaint against Chinook Motor Freight, Inc. The complaint alleged, inter alia, that Chinook Motor Freight, Inc., was unlawfully transporting liquid petroleum products in bulk, and requested the commission to order Chinook Motor Freight, Inc., to show cause why it should not be ordered to cease its unlawful…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Smith v. HollenbeckWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Jacobs v. Office of Unemployment Compensation & PlacementWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re HarmonWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Reiger v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Luisi Truck Lines, Inc. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Northern Pacific Transport Co. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Watkins v. Restorative Care Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- City Sanitary Service, Inc. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Pac. Nw Bell Telephone Co. v. Wa. U. & T. Com.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.