Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Carter

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 12, 1991No. 1317-89Published

1DissentMcCORMICK, Presiding Judge

As a general rule, a charging instrument that tracks the language of a penal statute is legally sufficient to inform the accused of the nature of the charges against him. Marrs v. State, 647 S.W.2d 286 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). When the Legislature establishes offenses and further defines the terms and elements of these offenses, “the definitions of the terms and elements are essentially evidentiary and need not be alleged in the indictment.” Thomas v. *201State, 621 S.W.2d 158, 161 (Tex.Cr.App.1981) (Opinion on Rehearing). An exception to this rule occurs when an element of the offense proscribes…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Marrs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Swope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Barraza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API