Legal Opinion
Jerdine v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 13, 2010No. Civil Action 09-01840 (PLF)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motions to dismiss. 1 For the reasons discussed in this Opinion, the motions will be granted, and this action will be dismissed with prejudice.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Anthony and Darryl Jerdine bring this action against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) in its capacity as the receiver for Washington Mutual Bank (‘WaMu”), Select Portfolio Servicing Inc. (“SPS”), and DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc. (“DLJ”) on claims arising “in Cuyahoga County, Ohio by virtue of a mortgage loan and related…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harbison v. U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign RelationsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Magritz v. Ozaukee CountyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Fuentes v. AzarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Phoenix Herpetological Society, Inc. v. United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Phoenix Herpetological Society, Inc. v. United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020