Legal Opinion
Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 18, 1992No. Court 90-10-00507PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GOLDBERG, Judge:
Plaintiff moves, pursuant to USCIT Rule 60(b), 1 for relief from an Order of Dismis sal entered in this action on May 12, 1992, on “the basis bf mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect.” Although the motion does not specify, as it should have, upon which of the several provisions of Rule 60(b) plaintiff relies, the court assumes plaintiff’s motion is predicated upon Rule 60(b)(1). In its motion, plaintiff asserts that counsel for defendant consents to the relief requested.
In support of plaintiffs motion, plaintiffs attorney states:
Counsel for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richard B. Dunlap v. Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- James Mizell v. The Attorney General of the State of New York and Ano.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. The Proceeds of Sale of 3,888 Pounds Atlantic Sea Scallops, Etc., Appeal of Arne Jensen and a & E Fisheries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- The Mennen Company v. The Gillette CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Freed v. Plastic Packaging Materials, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Caterpillar Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Citrus World, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Napp Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.