Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bertolino v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1989No. 88-1703Published

1DissentDouglas, J.

The case before us presents the perfect fact pattern as to why I have maintained that R.C. 4121.80 is legislation that was designed by the General Assembly to apply to so-called intentional torts arising during the course of employment but cannot, notwithstanding the action of the General Assembly, in fact, apply to workers’ compensation matters. An intentional tort is an activity that takes place outside the employment relationship (albeit during the course of employment) and thereby places the parties not in a position of employer-employee but, instead, in the position of alleged…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kunkler v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Kneisley v. Lattimer-Stevens Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Taylor v. Academy Iron & Metal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API