Coachella Valley Water District v. Western Allied Properties, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, Acting P. J.
The California Constitution guarantees the property owner in a condemnation action a jury trial on the question of “just compensation.” (Cal. Const., art. I, § 19.) In this appeal we decide the court’s evidentiary rulings improperly intruded on the jury’s role. We therefore reverse the judgment and remand the case for retrial of the jury phase consistent with the views expressed in this opinion. At the same time we affirm the court’s finding that Coachella Valley Water District complied with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (Pub.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Redevelopment Agency v. GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Keys v. RomleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Merced Irrigation District v. WoolstenhulmeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Peninsula Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Cornish Town v. KollerUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- City of San Diego v. Rancho Penasquitos PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- San Bernardino County Flood Control District v. GrabowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Contra Costa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. Lone Tree InvestmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.