Legal Opinion

Cannamore v. Bi-State Development Agency

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1971No. 33794Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing or Transfer

2Per curiam

Defendant-respondent seeks by its motion, timely filed after opinion, a rehearing in this court, or, in the alternative, a transfer of the case to the Supreme Court of Missouri. In our consideration of defendant’s contention on appeal that plaintiff failed to make a submissible case, we deem ourselves bound by the decision of the Supreme Court of Missouri in the case of Brindley v. Wells, 308 Mo. 1, 271 S.W. 48. The facts in that case so closely resemble those ‘submitted to the jury in this case that any effort to distinguish or differentiate appears futile.…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Harke v. HaaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Grindstaff v. J. Goldberg & Sons Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Shafer v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. Charlton Ex Rel. Charlton v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API