Legal Opinion
O'Connell v. Holton
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided May 10, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions
On bill to- enforce a covenant.
1Opinion of the Court
Leaming, V. C.
In this suit complainant seeks the enforcement of a restrictive building covenant which provides that — •
“No building shall at any time be erected within twenty feet of the front property line of any street or avenue.”
This is one of the covenants uniformly contained in the Chelsea Beach Company conveyances, which covenants have heretofore been before this court for enforcement in. repeated cases. *5Various reported eases touching this specific covenant are reviewed by Chancellor Walker in Pearson v. Stafford, 88 N. J. Eq. 385.
Complainant’s building is on Chelsea avenue.;…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Canda Realty Co. v. CarteretNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
- Lieberman v. Saddle River Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- J. M. Lehmann Co. v. S. B. Penick Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946