J. M. Lehmann Co. v. S. B. Penick Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Egan, Y. C.
The complainant has been engaged in the operation of a manufacturing plant in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, for approximately twenty-seven years. It occupies a tract of land adjacent to land owned by the defendant on which the latter operates an industrial plant for the manufaetuer of botanical drugs. The defendant’s land lies between the westerly boundary line of complainant’s land, and the easterly side of an alleged public street called Chase Avenue. On the westerly side of this alleged avenue defendant owns lands on which there are a number of buildings.
The hill, among other things,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. Mayor of South AmboySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
- United New Jersey Railroad & Canal Co. v. Crucible Steel Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915
- Hey v. Seifert & Baime, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
- Morrison v. Standard Oil Co. of N.J.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Darling v. Mayor of Jersey CityNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.