Legal Opinion

Medlin v. Havener

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 16, 1936No. 13431PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNKLIN, Chief Justice.

Otto Medlin instituted this suit against the owners and lessees of a swimming pool situated in Wichita county near the Jacks-boro highway, outside the corporate limits of the city of Wichita Falls, to recover damages resulting from the drowning of his 12 year old son Virgil Medlin, while bathing in the pool. He has prosecuted this appeal from a judgment sustaining a general demurrer to his petition urged by the owners of the premises after plaintiff had taken a nonsuit as against the lessees.

Since the general demurrer admits as true the material allegations in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Perez v. RabaudTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Pickens v. Boom Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Sawyer v. McGillicuddySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1889
  5. Larson v. Calder's Park Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Otto v. BoboCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Buffalo Lakes, Inc. v. McGrewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API