Legal Opinion

People v. Chessman

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1951No. Crim. 5006Published

1Opinion of the Court

38 Cal.2d 166 (1951)

THE PEOPLE, Respondent,

v.

CARYL CHESSMAN, Appellant.

Crim. No. 5006.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Dec. 18, 1951.

Caryl Chessman, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Frank Richards, Deputy Attorney General, S. Ernest Roll, District Attorney (Los Angeles), Jere J. Sullivan, Robert Wheeler and J. Miller Leavy, Deputy District Attorneys, for Respondent.

SCHAUER, J.

Defendant appeals from judgments of conviction of 17 felonies, rendered pursuant to jury verdicts, and from an order denying his motion for new trial. For convenience of discussion the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. People v. RalphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. In Re ShullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API