Legal Opinion

Wall v. Woods

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1925Published

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, J.-

— Respondent moves for an order compelling appellant to obtain a new surety on a supersedeas bond on the ground that one of the sureties on the supersedeas bond previously filed has become insolvent, and has left the state, which facts are not denied.

While California has held that, in the absence of a statute expressly empowering the appellate court to make such an order, it has no right so to do (Macomber v. Conradt, 4 Cal. Unrep. 723, 37 Pac. 382) ; the weight of authority and the better rule is the other way.

In furtherance of justice appellate courts have the inherent power,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hudson v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Astor v. Arcade Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Bock v. Sauk Center Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. American Brewing Co. v. TalbotSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. State ex rel. Heckel v. KleinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API