Legal Opinion

Blair v. Loomis

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 14, 1998No. 1:97 CV 2956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

WELLS, District Judge.

Introduction

This case is before the Court on the plaintiffs’ motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (docket no. 2). The defendants’ memorandum in opposition (docket no. 10), the plaintiffs’ memorandum of law (docket no. 12), and the plaintiffs’ response to the defendants’ memorandum (docket no. 13) also have been considered. On March 24, 1998, a hearing was held, limited to the issue of current visitation between the plaintiffs.

At the hearing, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Mutual of Ohio, (96-4218)/cross-Appellee v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant (96-4325) v. Columbia/hca Healthcare Corporation and Integrated Health Corporation, Third-Party (96-4241)/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Manson v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. BAZZETTA v. McGINNISCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Larson v. CooperAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  2. DeWitt v. WallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. Lewis v. DelmarDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API