Baker v. Arizona Department of Revenue
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Richard L. and Shira S. Baker appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on their claims that the alternative fuel statutes enacted in December 2000 violated the Contract Clauses of the United States and the Arizona Constitutions and deprived them of due process. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 The important facts are not in dispute. Beginning in the early 1990s, the Arizona Legislature authorized a variety of tax and grant incentives designed to encourage the purchase of or conversion to alternative fuel…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. CarltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Hawk v. PC Village Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- ARIZONA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Clark v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Robson Ranch Quail Creek, LLC v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.