Legal Opinion
Berg v. Kelley
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided May 6, 1991No. 90-107PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The plaintiffs, John and Patricia Berg, appeal from orders of the Superior Court (Temple, J.) denying their motion to amend and granting the defendant’s two motions to dismiss. We reverse and remand.
The relevant facts are as follows. The defendant, Winfield Kelley, Jr., a chiropractor, treated the plaintiff, John Berg, between June and December, 1986. Beginning in November, the plaintiff experienced adverse symptoms resulting in his hospitalization from December 1986 to February 1987. During his hospitalization, he was diagnosed as having a degenerative disease of the neck. The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Rowe v. John DeereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Adams v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Brady v. DuranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Hodgdon v. Beatrice D. Weeks Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Doggett v. Town of North Hampton Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Roberts v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Town of Plaistow v. RiddleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Evan Gray v. P Chester L. Gray, III, TrusteeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
- Gray v. GrayDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.