Legal Opinion

Town of Plaistow v. Riddle

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 15, 1996No. 95-743PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The Town of Plaistow Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA) ruled against the defendants, James and Karen Riddle d/b/a Timberlane Auto, after the defendants sought to remove certain restrictions from an occupancy permit. The defendants took a voluntary nonsuit after filing an appeal under RSA 677:4 (1986). In related but separate proceedings, the Superior Court {Goode, J.) ruled that the effect of the voluntary nonsuit after appeal was for the judgment to become effective as if no appeal had been taken, requiring the granting of a motion in limine that sought to exclude reference to claims made…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Doggett v. Town of North Hampton Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  2. Barton v. BartonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. Hughes v. HebertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
  4. Innie v. W & R, INC.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  5. Milford Quarry & Construction Co. v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moulton-Garland v. Cabletron Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  2. Evan Gray v. P Chester L. Gray, III, TrusteeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
  3. Gray v. GrayDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API