Malcolm v. Sims-Thompson Motor Car Co.

This controversy arises over the terms of an agreement whereby appellant placed his automobile with appellee» for the purpose of having it repaired and put in good condition. Appellant’s contention, briefly and in substance, is that he placed the ear with appellees October 12, 1911, under an agreement by which appellees, in consideration of $35, were to repair and place same in good running order, furnishing all part's necessary for that purpose. Appellant alleged that appellees not only neglected to do the work until February, 1912, but also at that time demanded $76 for the work, which…