Legal Opinion

Eagle Nest Corp. v. Carroll

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1942Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents. The plaintiff’s first cause of action is framed in equity and does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action because it does not show that the plaintiff has such a separate individual or peculiar interest and injury as would justify such an action. (Roosevelt v. Draper, 23 N. Y. 318; Demarest v. Wickham, 63 N. Y. 320; Doolittle v. Supervisors, 18 N. Y. 155; Altschul v. Ludwig, 216 N. Y. 459.) [179 Misc. 99.]

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Doolittle v. . Supervisors of Broome CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Altschul v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Roosevelt v. . DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  4. Demarest v. . WickhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Eagle Nest Corp. v. CarrollNew York Supreme Court · 1942