Legal Opinion

Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 10, 2005No. 04-15024PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

398 F.3d 1098

Bill LOCKYER, Attorney General of the State of California; The State of California, ex rel, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and

Department of Water Resources, Plaintiff,

v.

MIRANT CORPORATION; Mirant Americas, Inc.; Mirant California Investments, Inc.; Mirant California, L.L.C.; Mirant Americas Energy Marketing LP; Mirant Delta, L.L.C.; Mirant Potrero, L.L.C., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-15024.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted September 14, 2004.

Filed February 10, 2005.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Thomas Greene, Ken Alex, Damon M. Connolly, Paul Stein,…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Federal Resources Corp.District Court, D. Idaho · 2015
  2. Roffman v. REBBL, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API