Legal Opinion

Emigh-Winchell Hardware Co. v. Pylman

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1918No. Civ. No. 1582Published

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The action was against the owner and the contractor of a building for materials furnished for the use of said building, and for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. Plaintiff recovered judgment against the contractor for the amount of the claim, but judgment for costs was entered in favor of defendant Pylman, from, which the appeal has been taken. The court found that the work on the building was begun in the month of October, 1913, “and was completed on May 2, 1914 . . . and was then and there occupied by said owner as completed, and at the same time the said defendant Pylman and his family…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Lane & Bodley Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  3. Stimson Mill Co. v. Los Angles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Schwartz v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Hughes Manufacturing & Lumber Co. v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API