Legal Opinion

MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. SUGG

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 17, 2015No. 112,804PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGurich, J.

¶ In Ball v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund, 2015 OK 64, 360 P.3d 499, this Court held that under the 2005 version of 85 0.8. § 171 an employee must be a physically impaired person as defined by the applicable statute before he or she can seek benefits from the Multiple Injury Trust Fund. In Ball, the Claimant had no prior adjudicated on-the-job injuries but sought to combine a Crumby finding 1 of pre-existing disability made simultaneously with an adjudication of an on-the-job injury to render her a physically impaired person. We held that because of the Legislature's specific removal of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. J. C. Penney Co. v. CrumbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. BALL v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  3. Hammons v. Oklahoma Fixture Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Holley v. Ace American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. STRICKLEN v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2024
  2. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. GARRETTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. ENGLES v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  4. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. TWEEDYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  5. ENGLES v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API