MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. GARRETT
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtColbert, J.
¶ 1 The dispositive issue presented on review is whether the claimant met the statutory definition of a “physically impaired person” at the time of the claimant’s second on-the-job injury for purposes of determining eligibility for Multiple Injury Trust Fund (Fund) benefits. Subsumed in this determination is whether a duly-executed settlement agreement — memorialized on a form prescribed by the Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC) — constitutes an adjudication of the claimant’s disabilities. This Court answers both questions in the affirmative.
I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 On April 29,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- J. C. Penney Co. v. CrumbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Depuy v. HoemeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- BALL v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Bertrand v. Laura Dester CenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- IN THE MATTER OF L.D., AN ALLEGED DEPRIVED CHILDCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2026
- MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. GARRETTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. GARRETTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017