Legal Opinion

MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. GARRETT

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 27, 2017No. 112,961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColbert, J.

¶ 1 The dispositive issue presented on review is whether the claimant met the statutory definition of a “physically impaired person” at the time of the claimant’s second on-the-job injury for purposes of determining eligibility for Multiple Injury Trust Fund (Fund) benefits. Subsumed in this determination is whether a duly-executed settlement agreement — memorialized on a form prescribed by the Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC) — constitutes an adjudication of the claimant’s disabilities. This Court answers both questions in the affirmative.

I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 On April 29,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. J. C. Penney Co. v. CrumbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  2. Depuy v. HoemeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. BALL v. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUNDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Bertrand v. Laura Dester CenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. IN THE MATTER OF L.D., AN ALLEGED DEPRIVED CHILDCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2026
  2. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. GARRETTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. MULTIPLE INJURY TRUST FUND v. GARRETTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API