Legal Opinion

People v. Pena

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

*624OPINION OF THE COURT

Troy K. Webber, J.

The novel question presented is whether, under certain circumstances, the court may de-sequester a jury so that the jurors may return home for the weekend where it is clear that the jury will not be able to deliberate. The court finds that under certain circumstances, with the proper safeguards, it may de-sequester a jury without consent of the defendants.

Procedural History

Defendants were charged by indictment, inter alia, with robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]), robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [1]) and robbery in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Plummer v. RothwaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. FernandezNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API