Legal Opinion

People v. Fernandez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1993PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant claims that the trial court violated CPL 310.10 by permitting one or more jurors to attend church services during the lunch recess after the trial had entered the deliberations phase. When trial counsel learned what occurred, she moved for a mistrial, raising two objections: that she should have been consulted beforehand and that the jurors’ request should have been in writing. The court denied the motion, defendant was convicted, and the Appellate Division affirmed.

CPL 310.10 provides that once…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. . Dunbar Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. HanniganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. People v. DegondeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. People v. DonohueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. People v. SpeedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API