Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1981No. 84PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Defendant brings forward assignments of error relating to: the admission into evidence of certain items which he contends the state improperly failed to disclose before trial, failure of the trial court to suppress defendant’s incriminating statement, numerous evidentiary rulings, failure of the trial court to give a requested charge, portions of the trial court’s instructions to the jury, and the jury selection process. We have carefully examined each assignment and conclude that defendant’s trial was free from prejudicial error.

The state’s evidence tends to show the following:…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Sparks v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. JerrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. KirkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. ShankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API