Legal Opinion

Houghton v. Whitin Mach. Works

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided January 8, 1908No. 213PublishedCited by 9 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, Circuit Judge.

Houghton filed a bill against the Whitin Machine Works to restrain the infringement of letters patent No. 795,769. The defendant duly answered thereto, and the complainant replied. Thereafter counsel for the complainant signified to counsel for the defendant that the complainant proposed to dismiss the bill without prejudice. Almost immediately after learning this, *228the defendant filed a cross-bill, having for its sole object to prevent the dismissal of the complainant’s bill without prejudice. 'This was admitted with honorable frankness by the defendant’s counsel at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Union Rolling Mill Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Gilmore v. BortU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1905

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1912
  2. Cowham v. McNiderDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1919
  3. Tower v. StimpsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1909
  4. Young v. J. Samuels & Bro., Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1916
  5. The BainbridgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API