Associates Discount Corp. v. McKinney
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.
The pertinent North Carolina recording statute is G.S. 47-20. It provides that in case of personal estate where the donor, bar-gainor or mortgagor resides out of the State, the registration, to be valid, must be had “in the county where the said personal estate or some part of the same is situated.” The statute was amended by the Session Laws of 1949, Chapter 1129, but since the transaction under review transpired before the ratification of that act it has no bearing upon the rights of the parties.
Encyclopedic references and collations of authority in annotated cases support the proposition…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mercantile Acceptance Co. v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Hornthal v. . BurwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- W. H. Applewhite Co. v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Bank of Colerain v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Dillingham v. . GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Franklin National Bank v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Sloan Bros. v. . Sawyer-Felder Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- National Bank of Alaska v. SprinkleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968