Bissell v. Cushman
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to District Court of Gilpin Couniyy. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtThatcher, C. J.
This was an action upon a promissory-note, instituted before the Code went into effect, by the defendant in error against the makers "of the note, Charles C. Post, Charles EL. Morgan, Guy M. Hulett and Charles E. Bissell. Summons was duly served upon Bissell, Post and Hulett, and returned not found as to Morgan. Bissell plead to the action. A rule to plead was also taken against the other defendants served, viz.: Post and Hulett. Post and Hulett failed to plead in obedience to the rule, whereupon judgment by nil dicit was by the court entered against Post only. Post, as attorney, also entered…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dow v. RattleIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
- Kimball & Ward v. TannerIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by5 opinions
- Breene v. BoothColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
- Godding v. DeckerColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
- Beatty v. ReslerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
- Breene v. BoothColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
- Godding v. DeckerColorado Court of Appeals · 1893