Legal Opinion
Donald L. Wagner v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 28, 2004No. 03-5118PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Donald L. Wagner (“Wagner”) appeals from the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims, which held that the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (“ABCMR”) was not arbitrary, capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence. Wagner v. United States, 56 Fed. Cl. 634 (2003). The ABCMR explained that, although Mr. Wagner’s discharge violated Army Regulation (“AR”) 600-8-24 ¶ 2-31(h), any resulting error was harmless. Because we are unable to ascertain whether the Army’s violation of its regulation was harmless, we…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Stuart Sargisson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Dingess - Hartman v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Walter A. Bryant v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2010
- L IZZIE K. M AY FIELD v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005
- Lonnie A. Overton v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.