Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. v. City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 26, 1987No. 85SA134Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partVollack, Justice

I concur with Part IV, which holds that Electric Power Research Institute [hereinafter EPRI] was not denied due process. However, I respectfully dissent from Parts II and III, in which the plurality holds that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it ruled, under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) review, that EPRI is a non-profit corporation eligible for tax-exempt status under the Denver Revised Municipal Code.

I

The plurality correctly recognizes that C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) permits a district court’s reversal of an administrative agency’s ruling if the administrative body exceeded its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ross v. Fire and Police Pension Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Lee v. State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. United Presbyterian Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. Ford Leasing Development Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  5. Hessling v. City of BroomfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API