Legal Opinion

English v. Romanowski

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 15, 2010No. 08-2611PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J., joined by Sutton, J.,

MOORE, J. (p. 730), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

OPINION

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Respondent-Appellant Warden Kenneth Romanowski appeals the district court’s decision to grant Petitioner-Appellee Billy English conditional habeas relief. The district court found that English was entitled to habeas relief because his trial counsel rendered him ineffective assistance in violation of the Sixth Amendment when he failed to call a witness after promising her to the jury, or alternatively, when he failed to properly investigate the case. For the following…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Rompilla v. BeardSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. Myers (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Couch v. BookerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. Harold Wayne Nichols v. Stanton Heidle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Josh SmallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  5. Middlebrooks v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API