Legal Opinion

Oesterle v. City of Mason

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1994No. Docket No. 148008Published

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

Petitioners appeal as of right from an order granting respondent’s motion for partial summary disposition. We reverse.

Petitioners, Lyle and June Oesterle, own a parcel of land in Mason. The land is registered under a farmland development rights agreement as provided by the Farmland and Open Space Preservation Act, MCL 554.701 et seq.; MSA 26.1287(1) et seq. There is no residence or nonfarm structure on the registered land. On June 4, 1990, respondent confirmed a special assessment for curb and gutter, storm sewer, and street improvements along an existing roadway that abuts petitioners’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dykstra v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Beckman Production Services, Inc. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Primages International v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API