Luther Lumber Co. v. Sheldahl Savings Bank
Wyoming Supreme Court
ERROR to the District Court, Laramie County; Hon. Roderick N. Matson, Judge. The material facts are stated in the opinion. The court was without authority to change or modify the finding of facts after the expiration of the term at which the judgment .was entered and after execution had issued thereon. (Bethel v. Bethel, 6 Bush. (Ky.) 65; Barber v. Biloxi, 25 So. 298; Peterson v. Bank, 88 Ill. App. 190; Doe v. Min.
Read the full summary
ERROR to the District Court, Laramie County; Hon. Roderick N. Matson, Judge. The material facts are stated in the opinion. The court was without authority to change or modify the finding of facts after the expiration of the term at which the judgment .was entered and after execution had issued thereon. (Bethel v. Bethel, 6 Bush. (Ky.) 65; Barber v. Biloxi, 25 So. 298; Peterson v. Bank, 88 Ill. App. 190; Doe v. Min. Co., 60 Fed. 643; Buckles v. Bank, 63 Ill. 268; DeCastro v. Richardson, 25 Cal. 49; Horner v. Horner, 37 Ill. App. 199;- Ry. Co. v. Haynes, 82 Tex. 448; Heert v. Cruger, 14 Mise.…
1Opinion of the Court
Beard, Justice.
The plaintiff below,- Sheldahl Savings Bank, a corporation, filed its petition in the District Court against Luther Lumber Company, a corporation, and A. B. Schuetz as defendants. For a first cause of action it alleged that on March 7, 1908, the said defendants (the Luther Lumber Company by the name and style of “Luther Lumber Co.”) for value, made, executed and delivered to plaintiff their promissory note in writing, (a copy of which is hereto attached marked “Exhibit A.”) and thereby for value promised to pay plaintiff the sum of fifteen hundred dollars with eight per cent,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Goddard v. OrdwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Illinois Central Railroad v. WillenborgIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Reddick v. KeeslingIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- First Christian Church v. RobbOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Guinan v. DonnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McGinnis v. BeattyWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
- State Bank v. Bank ExaminerWyoming Supreme Court · 1929