Legal Opinion

In re Ware

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 15, 1942No. 4629PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Presiding Judge

Appellant brings before us for review the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the examiner rejecting three claims, numbered, respectively, 1, 6, and 38, of appellant’s application for a patent for a composition of matter claimed to have special utility in the manufacture of abrasive discs. As taken, the appeal covered a fourth claim, numbered.37, but at the hearing before us appellant moved' to dismiss the appeal as to that claim, which motion will be granted. Nine claims were allowed by the examiner which, of course, are not involved here.

We…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of Chester John Cavallito and Allan Poe GrayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. Carlo v. Bocciarelli v. Charles E. HuffmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  3. In re FreyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API