Sweatman v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Gardner, Presiding Judge.
This case has been before the Court of Appeals twice before. When it was first here the case was reversed with direction that the full board rehear the case because the full board did not hold a de novo hearing as provided by Code § 114-708. See Sweatman v. Hartford Accident &c. Co., 96 Ga. App. 243 (99 S. E. 2d 548). On the second appearance of the case here the reversal turned on whether or not proper notice had been given. See Sweatman v. Hartford Accident &c. Co., 100 Ga. App. 734 (112 S. E. 2d 440). The case is here now so that this court can pass on the merits…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hall v. KendallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- American Motorists Insurance v. BlaylockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Maryland Casualty Company v. PitmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Sweatman v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.