Legal Opinion

In the Matter of James Lee Hartley, Debtor. James Lee Hartley v. Rickey D. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 17, 1989No. 88-1839PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The petition of appellee for rehearing en banc was granted, thereby vacating the panel opinion, and this case now has been reheard by the Court en banc. Judges John R. Gibson, Bowman, Wollman, Magill, and Beam vote to affirm the judgment of the District Court. Chief Judge Lay and Judges Henley, McMillian, Arnold, and Fagg vote to reverse that judgment. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of James Lee Hartley, Debtor. James Lee Hartley v. Rickey D. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rupert v. Krautheimer (In Re Krautheimer)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Cablevision Systems Corp. v. Cohen (In Re Cohen)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1990
  3. Rupert v. Krautheimer (In Re Krautheimer)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  4. Brzys v. Lubanski (In Re Lubanski)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  5. North Tel, Inc. v. Brandl (In Re Brandl)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API