Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Boise Cascade Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 24, 1996No. 93-09021; CA A84564PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that reduced his award of unscheduled permanent partial disability (PPD). He argues that the rule that the Board applied to determine the award is invalid. We agree and reverse and remand for reconsideration.
The facts are undisputed. Claimant compensably injured his back and later was released to his regular work. The Notice of Closure did not award him PPD for the loss of function in his back. An Order on Reconsideration affirmed the Notice of Closure. Claimant requested a hearing. At the hearing, the referee awarded…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Owens v. Motor Vehicles DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Karjalainen v. Curtis Johnston & Pennywise, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Linn-Benton-Lincoln Education Ass'n/OEA/NEA v. Linn-Benton-Lincoln ESDCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Anderson v. CardenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.