Legal Opinion

Peters v. Spielvogel

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 21, 1964No. 63-407PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDRY, Judge.

Appellants were the vendors in a contract to sell a restaurant to appellees. The contract provided in pertinent ;part:

“* * * after reasonable diligence on his part said title shall not be made good and marketable within a reasonable time, the seller shall, return the money this day paid and all monies ■ that may have been paid to him under this contract * * * ”

The vendees paid to the vendors’' attorney, as escrow agent, $5,500 upon the execution of the above contract on November 20, 1961. The contract provided for the purchase of the vendors’ restaurant, and the realty upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Cradock v. CooperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Wheeler v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  4. Kehl, Et Ux. v. Miami Title Abstract Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gassen v. Universal Building Materials, Inc. (In Re Berkley Multi-Units, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1987
  2. Dynasty Express Corp. v. Kurtzman (In Re AGSY, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. Travelers Indem. Co. v. Housing Auth. of City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  4. Chafetz v. PriceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Bradfordt Co. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc. (In Re Hallmark Builders, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API