Legal Opinion

Schlusselberg v. Werly

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 30, 1967No. 67 Civ. 94PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYATT, District Judge.

This is a motion by certain of the defendants for an order dismissing the action for improper venue (28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) (3)). There is a motion in the alternative by these same defendants for an order transferring the action to the District of Massachusetts “[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice” (28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)). Two other defendants move to transfer the action to the District of Massachusetts for the same reason.

The action was commenced on January 10, 1967. There is one claim in the complaint, made by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Brown v. BullockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. TenneyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
  2. Scheinbart v. Certain-Teed Products CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  3. Helfant v. Louisiana & Southern Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1979
  4. Kreisner v. Hilton Hotel Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979
  5. Korn v. MerrillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API