Van Hoosen v. Kramer

MEMORANDUM*

Daniel Stanley Van Hoosen appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm.

The district court determined that the petition was second or successive because Van Hoosen was, for a second time, attempting to overturn his conviction and the first petition had been decided on the merits. We agree that the petition *591was a second or successive attack on his conviction. Therefore, Van Hoosen was required to obtain an order from this court before he filed that petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A); Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S.…