Legal Opinion
McFarland v. State Sav. Bank
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana
Decided September 10, 1904No. 222PublishedCited by 6 opinions
In Equity. On exceptions to answers.
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a citizen of Idaho, has brought this suit against the above-named defendants, who are citizens of Montana. A mere general statement of the salient features of the bill of complaint is now necessary. Complainant seeks to recover, inter alia, 1,000 shares of the capital stock in the Dargey Dumber Company, which, it is alleged, were transferred to the defendant Dulu F. Dargey without any consideration therefor, and for her accommodation, to enable her to pledge the same as a collateral security for a loan or loans of money from the defendants the State Savings…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Huntington v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Excelsior Wooden Pipe Co. v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Tillinghast v. ChaceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1903
3Cited by6 opinions
- Luten v. CampDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
- Indiana Mfg. Co. v. Nichols & Shepard Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1910
- Johnson v. MundySupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Victor G. Bloede Co. v. CarterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1906
- Calahan v. Holland-Cook Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.