Legal Opinion

Saladini v. Righellis

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 8, 1997PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, J.

The plaintiff, Lisa Saladini, appeals from the decision of a judge in the Superior Court dismissing her complaint, sua sponte, on the ground that a written agreement she had with the defendant, George P. Righellis, was champertous and unenforceable. Saladini had sought a declaratory judgment establishing her rights under the agreement. We granted Saladini’s application for direct appellate review to consider whether we should continue to enforce the doctrine. We rule that the common law doctrines of champerty, barratry, and maintenance no longer shall be recognized in Massachusetts. *232We…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pupecki v. James Madison Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Gill v. Richmond Co-operative Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. McInerney v. Massasoit Greyhound Association, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Bentinck v. FranklieTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Baskin v. PassMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Miller UK Ltd. v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  2. Osprey, Inc. v. Cabana Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. New Hampshire Insurance v. McCannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Toste Farm Corp. v. Hadbury, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  5. McIntosh v. Irwin Union Bank & Trust, Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API