Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bankston

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1993No. 2192 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

The Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing (DOT), appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County remanding an operator’s license suspension appeal to DOT with direction to impose the lesser sanction of requiring a special driver’s examination. DOT contends that the trial court erred when it determined that DOT improperly ordered a fifteen-day suspension in this case. Because of the recently expanded role of the trial court in this area, we affirm its order.

The factual and procedural history of this case is summarized as follows. Arbie…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP., ETC. v. KobalySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Friedlander v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Roth v. Borough of VeronaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. FioreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. DanielsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldstein v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API