People v. Veamatahau
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtMargulies, J.
*725*70After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of, among other things, two misdemeanor counts of possession of personal identifying information and possession of a controlled substance, alprazolam (Xanax). On appeal, he argues the trial court erroneously denied his motion to dismiss both charges under Penal Code section 1118.1. He further contends his controlled substance possession conviction must be reversed because the prosecution's expert conveyed inadmissible, case-specific hearsay to the jury.
In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude the prosecution's expert's testimony that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. StampsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Flint, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Jeffrey G., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. VeamatahauCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020