Legal Opinion
Hazard v. McAndrews
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 28, 1897No. 2658PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. E. D. Benson, Judge.
1Per curiam
Upon the trial below the following order was made and entered:
“ This cause called regularly for trial, both parties appearing by their respective counsel, the following jurors are duly impanelled and sworn to try the issues joined herein, to-wit: F. A. Iverson, R. S. Robinson, R. R. Starr, E. Jones, George Hooker, G. Edenholm, J. Sander-son, A. A. Osborn, John Hink, B. F. Leed, D. K. Sickles, J. F. Terrice.
“ Trial proceeds by the examination of witnesses sworn and documentary evidence introduced on behalf of the plaintiff. Defendant’s motion for non-suit is overruled. Exceptions allowed.…
2Cited by4 opinions
- City of Clinton Ex Rel. Richardson v. KeenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Case v. FoxOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Jordan Valley Irrigation District v. Title & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Milam v. YoungMississippi Supreme Court · 1948